People Ops Buyer.

BUYER WORKSHEETS · LOCAL REVIEW

What happens after a payroll discrepancy is flagged?

People Ops Buyer research desk · Updated

Record the discrepancy, investigate the supporting change, obtain approval and confirm the correction was executed. Alerting someone does not resolve the case, and approval does not prove that payroll has been corrected.

This walkthrough uses a fictional bonus change. It records the actions you enter and retains their sequence while the page is open. It is not connected to payroll, a supplier support system or a real approval service.

START WITH AN EXAMPLE

Resolve a payroll exception

Choose a filled-in example, then change what matters to you. Every number and date is illustrative. Choosing another example replaces your entries.

See the worked example and its assumptions

Expected payroll of £30,000 and a revised £30,600 amount gives a £600 discrepancy. Investigation requires an owner and evidence; approval requires an approver; resolution requires confirmation of execution. Changing material case inputs returns it to alerted; adding execution confirmation preserves approval.

Your entries stay in this tab. Download your result before leaving; another tool starts with its own example.

Compare expected and actualCase / supporting change: Bonus changed after payroll preparation · GBP · Expected payroll amount: 30000
Record decisionsProvider payroll lead · Evidence and proposed correction: Confirm whether the bonus change was authorised. · Finance approver

Your working result

Current entered scenario; read the assumptions below
ItemResult / next action
CaseBonus changed after payroll preparation
Statealerted
Expected / actual£30,000.00 / £30,600.00
Discrepancy£600.00
Deadline2026-11-25 · Europe/Zurich
InvestigatorProvider payroll lead
ApproverFinance approver
Evidence / proposed correctionConfirm whether the bonus change was authorised.
Next actionRecord an investigation and proposed correction.

The download includes the current inputs, result and method. It is a record of your entries, not a verified supplier commitment.

Method and evidence

Each explicit action advances one state: alerted → investigated → approved → resolved. Editing amounts, case context, evidence or owners invalidates prior approval and returns the case to alerted. Adding execution confirmation preserves approval. The exported history records the user’s actions and timestamps, not independent evidence of provider performance.

Suggested payroll-change buying exercise. These tools reuse the existing research and calculation patterns. Worked prices, dates, owners and service scenarios are illustrative. Replace them with confirmed inputs.

Review the Swiss payroll budget · Check the two-quote funding example in EOR Truth

Continue the buying decision

Next: Plan the first payroll →

Return to the HR and finance brief · Read the Teamed assessment for Switzerland